Production

Flexo, Offset and Digital Printing: A Packaging Cost Comparison

One-off and per-unit costs of flexo, offset and digital printing in packaging — which is economical at which quantity and colour count?

PPPackPrice Team·May 10, 20269 min read

For the same box, flexo, offset and digital printing can give wildly different prices — and there's no fixed answer for "the cheapest method." The right method shifts at the intersection of quantity, colour count and quality expectation. In this article we compare the cost logic of the three methods.

Özetle
  • Digital has no one-off cost but a high per-unit cost; it wins at low volume.
  • Flexo is cheapest at high volume + few colours; plate cost melts as it spreads across units.
  • Offset offers high quality/detail but a high plate cost; preferred for coated-carton work.

The cost structure of the three methods

MethodOne-offPer unitQuality
DigitalNone / very lowHighHigh (short runs)
FlexoMedium (plates)LowMedium
OffsetHigh (plates)MediumVery high

Why one-off cost is so decisive is detailed in tooling and plate cost.

Where do the cost curves cross?

At low volume digital starts ahead; but as quantity rises, digital's high per-unit cost makes it expensive and flexo takes over. A typical crossover example:

Total print cost for 2,000 units, 2 colours (relative)
Digital≈ 70%
Flexo≈ 100% (base)
Offset≈ 135%
Total print cost for 20,000 units, 2 colours (relative)
Digital≈ 210%
Flexo≈ 100% (base)
Offset≈ 120%

The figures are indicative, but the logic is clear: as quantity rises, flexo/offset overtake digital.

Which one when?

Choose digital

Low volume, many variants, fast turnaround, frequent design changes. With no plate cost, it's economical on small runs.

Choose flexo / offset

High volume, fixed design. Flexo on corrugated board, offset on coated carton and high-quality work. One-off cost spreads across units.

Colour count is critical

In flexo and offset, each colour means a separate plate. Going from 1 to 4 colours roughly quadruples the one-off cost. A low-colour design delivers serious savings at high volume.

Method selection is ultimately a cost optimisation: pin down quantity and colours, then compare total cost across the three methods. For the big picture, return to the packaging pricing guide.

Compare print methods by price

Enter quantity and colours; let PackPrice compare cost by method.

Try Free

Frequently Asked Questions

Which printing method is economical at low volume?
Digital is economical at low volume because it has no one-off plate/die cost. Even with a higher per-unit cost, total cost stays below flexo/offset for small quantities.
What is the cost difference between flexo and offset?
Flexo prints directly on corrugated board with a moderate plate cost and is cheap for high-volume, low-colour jobs. Offset offers higher quality and detail but high plate cost, typically used on coated carton and laminated boxes.
What determines the choice of printing method?
Three variables: quantity, colour count and quality expectation. High volume + few colours → flexo; high quality + medium volume → offset; low volume + many variants → digital. The cost curves cross at a certain quantity.

Price your packaging in seconds

PackPrice calculates every cost line in this guide automatically with AI. Try it free.

Try Free

Related Articles